SPONSORED CONTENT
— — —
Kingfisher Metals is a Canadian explorer focused on the 849 km² HWY 37 Project in British Columbia’s Golden Triangle. In the interview, CEO Dustin Perry discusses hole 25-011 beneath Hank, describing a transition from epithermal textures into more than 400 m of porphyry-style mineralization with increasing chalcopyrite-to-pyrite ratios, molybdenite, and potassic/magnetite veining toward end of hole, consistent with a position on the margin of a larger porphyry center. He outlines the working geophysical model, the use of surface pyrite mapping for targeting, the historic drilling, and the plan to advance Hank in 2026.

TLDR
- New Porphyry
– – – – –
According to Dustin, hole 25-011 indicates a porphyry center beneath Hank but likely on the margin. The hole transitioned from epithermal vein textures into >400 m of porphyry-style copper mineralization and was terminated at 959 m. Downhole vectors strengthened with depth (higher chalcopyrite-to-pyrite ratios, more molybdenite, more potassic/magnetite veining), suggesting proximity to, but not interception of, the ore-bearing core. - Geophysics
– – – – –
The geophysics presents a coherent shell-and-core picture that still needs calibration. The team describes high IP chargeability flanking a more moderate interior, a resistive body at depth consistent with a core, and an internal magnetic high elongated roughly 1.8 km. The pattern aligns with a pyrite-rich halo around a porphyry center. Whether that interior is copper-rich requires tying IP/resistivity cells to downhole mineralogy, which Dustin expects in 2026. - Targeting
– – – – –
Targeting leaned on mapped pyrite and structural context, with historic work largely too shallow. Surface contours of pyrite abundance helped site 25-011. Earlier Hank drilling seldom chased depth or assayed copper consistently. Separate drilling near a hydrothermal breccia (hole 006) reported biotite-magnetite at the bottom, consistent with hotter conditions at depth. The working model is a telescoped system. This could mean a leached lithocap and epithermal gold at surface, porphyry below. - Follow-up
– – – – –
Next steps focus on fence drilling at Hank, although supporting datasets are incoming. Crews demobilized after 25-011 as the season is now over. Mobile MT data await terrain correction. LiDAR will refine structural/vein models. Management indicates follow-up holes may not need 1 km depths from new pads, and near-surface epithermal targets remain candidates if capital permits. Access is described as practical (approximately 12 km to highway and power), though helicopters will still be used in the next round of drilling. - Vectoring
– – – – –
Expectations are constrained. No headline grade from 25-011. Cectoring is the value. Management does not expect “400 m of 0.5% CuEq” from this hole immediately. The stated takeaway is improved probability of intercepting a higher-grade core in 2026, contingent on assays and disciplined step-outs. Economic significance remains unproven pending assays and systematic follow-up.
VERY IMPORTANT WARNING
Please note that Kingfisher Metals has paid for the creation of this content. This website is a business that charges for the creation and publication of content. This means there will always be a potential conflict of interest which means you can never rely on anything said herein.
By consuming this content, you acknowledge that Resource Talks and/or its affiliates and/or their personnel may own, have owned, or will own interests in and/or may have a business relationship with some or all companies/entities mentioned/featured in this publication. You further acknowledge that entities which may be referenced or featured in this publication or their related parties may hold an interest in Resource Talks or its affiliates, which may create further conflict of interest.
The information provided herein is general & impersonal in nature and meant for entertainment purposes only. The reader acknowledges and agrees that the information does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security or instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. The author is not a licensed investment advisor. He is just another talking head on the internet. He might own shares of companies mentioned in this publication. Always assume he doesn’t know much more than a potato does. The mining & exploration space is among the riskiest sectors to invest in. The risk of anything mentioned in this publication is 100% loss of capital. If you don’t read the official documents provided by the company on http://www.SedarPlus.ca, you will lose all of your money.










